Philosophically speaking the claim that the Bible in its entirety is literal and inerrant (i.e. self-evident, internally coherent, and a reflection of the mind of God) operates as a ‘master signifier’. This means that it is a claim without any specific content that is worn as a badge to let you know what team you play for. It doesn’t matter too much how you actually fill in this empty container as long as you make the claim. It functions then as a shibboleth that identifies you as being in a certain tribe.

For as soon as one attempts to actually enact what it might mean to hold the bible as literal and inerrant (i.e. to fill this claim with content) one must treat large parts of the text as taboo. What becomes clear is that the person who makes the abstract claim that the bible is literal and inerrant, when enacting the claim, always refutes themselves.

- Peter Rollins, How to Cut Up the Bible Without Anyone Noticing

52 notes


  1. ohdoubters reblogged this from invisibleforeigner
  2. invisibleforeigner posted this
--> Creative Commons License
This work by Invisible Foreigner is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.